Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

»óÈ£ ȣȯ¼º ÀÖ´Â ÀÓÇ÷£Æ® Áö´ëÁÖ¿Í °íÁ¤Ã¼°£ÀÇ ÀûÇÕµµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A Study on fit of the interchangeable Implant Abutment and Fixture

±¸°­»ý¹°Çבּ¸ 1998³â 22±Ç 2È£ p.289 ~ 301
±è¹ÌÁ¤, ¼Õ¹Ì°æ, ±ÇÇõ½Å, Á¤ÀçÇå,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¹ÌÁ¤ (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¼Õ¹Ì°æ (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
±ÇÇõ½Å (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Á¤ÀçÇå (  ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Dental implantology has been one of the most rapidly widespreading and developing fields
of dental practice. Recently, various implant systems were supplied, especially interchangeable implant abutments and fixtures were suppli-!l.
The purpose of this study was to examine the fit of various implant interchangeable abutments - Steri-Oss fixture interface. The maginal fit was measured by means of a scanning electron microscope(SEM).
The following results were obtained=
1. The largest gap was shown when Estheticone abutment of Branemark system was connected with Steri-Oss fixture (28.10 6.69mm)
2. In case of UCLA type abutments were connected with Steri-Oss fixture, the size of gap was shown in the order of the case of BrAnemark UCLA abutment (5.673.43gm), the case of Steri-Oss HL Hexed abutment (3.961.15gm), the case of 3i Gold UCLA abutment (3.01 1.35 g m).
3. It seems that the interchar, geable abutments, except the case of Estheticone abutment of Branemark system, can be used because most of intechangeable abutments don¢¥t have large difference in gap.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI